coal crusher and screening plant
Coal Crusher and Screening Plant: An Integrated System for Efficient Coal Preparation
The processing of raw coal into a consistent, marketable product requires a well-coordinated system where the coal crusher and screening plant are the core components. This integrated setup is designed to size and separate coal efficiently, ensuring it meets specific customer specifications for particle size distribution and quality. The crusher reduces the large mined coal into smaller fragments, while the screening plant classifies these fragments into various size fractions. Together, they form the backbone of coal preparation, directly impacting productivity, transportation efficiency, and combustion performance in downstream applications like power generation.
The Role and Types of Coal Crushers
Coal crushers are primary size reduction machines. They break down large run-of-mine (ROM) coal, which can contain lumps over a meter in size, into a more manageable top size, typically ranging from 50mm to 200mm. The choice of crusher depends on coal hardness (friability), moisture content, required product size, and capacity.
-
Primary Crushers: Often located at the mine site or plant feed point to handle the initial coarse reduction. Common types include:
- Jaw Crushers: Use a fixed and a moving jaw to compress and break material. Ideal for hard, abrasive coal.
- Gyratory Crushers: Similar in concept to jaw crushers but with a conical head gyrating within a larger chamber. Used for very high-capacity primary crushing.
- Sizer Crushers: Utilize two rotors with teeth that crush coal by impact and shear. Excellent for wet, sticky coal as they are less prone to clogging.
-
Secondary/ Tertiary Crushers: Further reduce coal size after primary crushing or screening.
- Impact Crushers (Hammer Mills): Use high-speed hammers to shatter coal by impact. Suitable for softer coals but generate more fines.
- Roll Crushers: Crush material between two counter-rotating cylinders. Provide good control over product size with minimal fines generation.
The Function and Mechanics of Screening Plants
Screening is the separation of crushed material into two or more size fractions using a meshed surface (screen deck). It is critical for:
- Removing undersize material before crushing (scalping) to improve crusher efficiency.
- Dividing the crushed product into specified commercial sizes (e.g., lump coal, nuts, peas).
- De-dusting by removing fine particles (<6mm).
Common screen types include:
- Vibrating Screens (Inclined or Horizontal): The most common type; screens vibrate to stratify material and convey it across the deck apertures.
- Roller Screens: Use rotating shafts with discs to separate large lumps; effective for sticky coal.
System Integration: Crushing Circuits
Crushers and screens are arranged in circuits. A typical two-stage crushing circuit might involve:
- ROM coal is first screened ("scalped") to remove natural fines.
- Oversize material goes to a primary crusher.
- The crushed output is combined with the scalped fines and sent to a secondary screen.
- Screen oversize is sent to a secondary crusher for further reduction.
- Screen undersize becomes final product.
This closed-circuit design ensures precise control over the top size of the final product.
Key Considerations: Mobile vs. Stationary Plants.jpg)
| Feature | Stationary Plant | Mobile/ Semi-mobile Plant |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Large-scale mines with long life (>10 years), fixed infrastructure. | Contract mining, smaller deposits, temporary sites, or satellite pits requiring relocation. |
| Capacity | Very high (thousands of tonnes per hour). | Low to medium (up to ~1500 tph). |
| Capital Cost | Higher initial investment in foundations and structures. | Lower initial capital cost; faster setup time. |
| Flexibility | Fixed location; inflexible once built. | High mobility; can be relocated as mining faces advance or project needs change using modular trailers or crawlers/skids . |
| Operational Cost | Generally lower per-tonne cost at high volumes due to economies of scale . | May be higher per-tonne but offset by reduced haulage costs from pit-face proximity . |
(Source considerations: Industry standard comparisons based on equipment manufacturer white papers from companies like Metso Outotec , FLSmidth , Sandvik , & ThyssenKrupp.)
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
1. What determines whether I should use an impact crusher or a roll crusher for coal?
The choice primarily hinges on coal characteristics and desired product yield.Impact crushers (e.g., hammer mills) are effective for softer coals but produce a higher percentage of fines due to their high-speed fracturing action.Roll crushers, employing compression crushing,generate significantly fewer fines. They are preferred when producing products like stoker coal where minimizing fines is critical . The decision requires analysis of feed gradation, hardness tests like HGI (Hardgrove Grindability Index), moisture content,and target product specifications .
2. How does moisture affect screening efficiency?
High surface moisture in fine particles causes them to agglomerate ("blinding" or "plugging" screen apertures)or adhereto larger lumps.This severely reduces screening accuracyand throughput.Dry screeningis most efficient.For moist materials,solutions include using screens designedfor such conditions—such ashigh-frequency vibrating screensor roller screens—and potentially adding heatto drythe feed .
3. Can mobile crushing plants handle large-scale operations?
Historically,mobile plants were seen as lower-capacity units.Modern semi-mobile crushing stations(SMCS)mounted on heavy-duty modules have significantly closed this gap.They can handle capacities exceeding10,000 tphand are usedin some ofthe world's largest mines.The key advantageis their abilityto be relocatedperiodicallyvia heavy transportto minimize truck haulage distancesfrom deep pits,a concept knownas "in-pit crushingand conveying"(IPCC),which offers substantialoperational cost savings .
Real-World Application Case Study
A prominent example demonstrating this integration is an IPCC system implemented at an open-pit thermalcoal minein Indonesia.The challenge was escalating fuel costs associatedwith long-distance truck haulagefrom deeper pitstoa fixed preparation plant..jpg)
-
Solution:The mine deployeda semi-mobileprimarycrushing stationequippedwitha largegyratorycrusher.The entire stationwas positionedwithin themining pit.As excavators loadedROMcoal directlyinto its hopper,thecrusher reducedthecoalmaterialtoa minus-250mmproduct.Thisproductwas then dischargedontoamoveable shiftable beltconveyor thatextendedas themine face advanced.The conveyor transportedthecrushedcoal directlytothe stationarysecondarycrushingandscreeningplantlocatedat themine's centralinfrastructurearea .
-
Outcome:This system eliminateddozensof truck journeysper hour.It resultedina reported~30% reductionin overallmaterial handlingcosts,a significantdecreaseinfuel consumption,and alower carbon footprintforthe operation.The secondaryplantthen performedprecise sizingusingvibrating screensor finalproductgrades.This case underscoreshowthe strategicintegrationofcrushing(primary)and screening(secondary)technologycan drive majorefficiency gainsinlarge-scalecoal operations .
